The Politics of Prostitution: Power, History, and the Battle Over Women’s Bodies

ByTimothy Alexander

Prostitution is one of the oldest professions, the oldest taboos, and the oldest political battlefields. Every society—from ancient Mesopotamia to modern America—has tried to control it, regulate it, outlaw it, tolerate it, moralize it, exploit it, or hide it. No policy has ever solved it. No ideology has ever understood it completely. No government has ever been honest about it.

The modern fight over prostitution—rebranded in some circles as “sex work”—isn’t just about morality, public health, or crime. It’s about power. It’s about who gets to define consent. It’s about who the law protects and who it punishes. It’s about whether women’s bodies belong to themselves or to the state, to the market, to men, or to moral crusaders who claim to speak for them. And it’s about what happens when technology, ideology, feminism, policing, and economics collide in one combustible issue.

This report dives into the global and U.S. politics of prostitution by following four major threads:

  1. Historical context—from ancient empires to the modern nation-state

  2. Comparative legal frameworks—criminalization, legalization, decriminalization, and the Nordic model

  3. Health, safety, labor, and digital implications

  4. The feminist civil war—radical, liberal, sex-positive, intersectional, anti-carceral, and Marxist interpretations

The goal is not to glorify or condemn prostitution but to understand it: the politics around it, the people shaped by it, and the systems that weaponize it.

PART I: A HISTORY WRITTEN ON WOMEN’S BODIES

Ancient Mesopotamia: Where It All Begins

The earliest documented forms of prostitution appear in ancient Mesopotamia, where women’s bodies were directly tied to household economic survival. In an economy shaped by debt, slavery, and rigid patriarchy, prostitution emerged not as a free profession but as a survival strategy. Some women worked in inns, others in taverns, others in temple-associated contexts. Whether the “sacred prostitution” narratives are perfectly accurate or not, the underlying reality remains: sex-for-pay existed, was tolerated, and was deeply entwined with social hierarchy.

This was not “empowerment.” Nor was it framed strictly as “immoral.” It was a regulated outlet in a society where poor women had few exits from deprivation and where the state often treated female bodies as economic assets.

Ancient Greece and Rome: Legal, Regulated, and Stigmatized

Classical Athens brought the first formal legal frameworks. Solon, the lawgiver credited with early democratic reforms, was also credited with establishing state-run brothels with fixed prices. Prostitutes were taxed. Brothels were licensed. A hierarchical system developed:

  • Pornai – low-status, often enslaved, brothel or street workers

  • Hetairai – high-status courtesans, sometimes educated, sometimes politically influential

  • Male prostitutes – serving male clients, common and openly acknowledged

Rome followed a similar pattern. Prostitution was legal and openly practiced. Women (and some men) registered with authorities and paid taxes. But the stigma was severe. Registered prostitutes lost social standing and legal privileges; they were “infames,” denied the rights of respectable citizens.

The pattern that still haunts us today was established here: prostitution as a tolerated yet stigmatized institution, legal yet socially degraded, regulated for the benefit of male citizens and the state.

Medieval Europe: The Church Condemns, but Cities Cash In

When Christianity took over Europe, prostitution officially became a sin. But medieval city governments—facing growing populations of unmarried men, transient laborers, and soldiers—quietly adopted a more pragmatic approach. Many cities operated or licensed brothels. They regulated clothing, movement, curfews, and the location of “red-light districts.”

This uneasy moral-political compromise lasted centuries. When syphilis outbreaks or religious revivals struck, authorities closed brothels. When closures increased street violence and disorder, cities reopened them. What changed wasn’t prostitution itself, but who claimed the moral high ground.

Early Modern and Industrial-Era Reformers

By the 18th and 19th centuries, the industrializing world transformed prostitution into a major public health and law enforcement issue. Europe’s “reglementation” model subjected prostitutes to mandatory inspections, registration, and surveillance—explicitly to protect men (soldiers, husbands) from sexually transmitted diseases.

Early feminists condemned this system as a sexist double standard. Men bought sex freely; women were policed, inspected, and punished. This criticism planted the seeds of modern abolitionist feminism.

Throughout all of history, one thing is constant: prostitution emerges when poverty, gender inequality, war, migration, and urbanization intersect. It is not an aberration. It is a reflection of the society around it.

PART II: MODERN LEGAL MODELS AND WHY THEY CONTRADICT EACH OTHER

Today, four major legal frameworks define the politics of prostitution. Each claims moral superiority. Each produces unintended consequences. And none truly resolves the tension between autonomy, safety, exploitation, and state control.

1. Full Criminalization

(United States majority, Africa, much of Asia)

Under this model, selling sex, buying sex, and all third-party activities are illegal. This is the default approach in most of the United States, except a few rural counties in Nevada.

Supporters argue it protects society from moral decay and fights trafficking.

Critics counter that:

  • Sex workers become the easiest targets for arrest

  • Street work becomes more dangerous

  • Police abuse becomes common

  • Reporting violence becomes risky

  • Criminal records trap people in the trade

In the U.S., full criminalization exists beside a multibillion-dollar porn industry, legal strip clubs, and platforms like OnlyFans. This contradiction reveals that criminalization is not about eliminating paid sex—it’s about which forms of sex the state approves and which bodies it criminalizes.

2. Legalization

(Netherlands, Germany, parts of Nevada)

Legalization creates a formal, regulated industry. Brothels operate with licenses. Workers undergo health checks. The government collects taxes. On paper, it’s clean and controlled.

In reality:

  • Only certain workers qualify for legal status

  • Undocumented migrants remain in illegal markets

  • Registration can force workers to out themselves socially

  • Regulation can create state-sanctioned exploitation

Legalization improves conditions for some, but not all. It can create a “legal elite” of sex workers while pushing others further underground.

3. Full Decriminalization

(New Zealand, parts of Australia, Belgium’s expanded model)

Decriminalization removes all criminal penalties for consensual adult sex work while enforcing strict laws against coercion, trafficking, and abuse. Sex workers can work independently, in small groups, or for licensed employers. They can refuse clients. They can seek labor protections. They can report crimes without fear.

Supporters argue that:

  • Violence decreases

  • Health outcomes improve

  • Exploitation becomes easier to identify

  • Workers gain the same rights as others

Critics—especially abolitionist feminists—worry it normalizes a harmful industry.

4. Nordic / Neo-Abolitionist Model

(Sweden, Norway, Iceland, France, Canada, Ireland)

This model criminalizes buyers, not sellers. Sex workers are framed as victims; clients as perpetrators. Third parties—brothels, managers, website operators—are criminalized.

Supporters argue it discourages demand and expresses feminist values.

Critics counter that:

  • The trade is pushed underground

  • Screening clients becomes harder

  • Housing and safety become unstable

  • Migrant workers face raids, detention, and deportation

The Nordic model’s real-world results depend heavily on how it’s enforced—and on whether it offers genuine economic support.

PART III: HEALTH, SAFETY, LABOR, AND DIGITAL CONSEQUENCES

Public Health: Criminalization Makes Sex More Dangerous

Across global studies, criminalization correlates with higher HIV and STI rates among sex workers. Why?

  • Condoms are confiscated as evidence

  • Outreach workers cannot operate effectively

  • Violence goes unreported

  • Clinics cannot safely engage workers

Decriminalization and regulated indoor venues improve public health by making prevention and treatment accessible.

Violence: When the Law Makes You a Target

Where sex workers cannot call the police for help, predators feel protected. Violence increases. Criminalization effectively designates some people as “unrapeable,” because reporting sexual assault risks arrest.

In decriminalized environments, workers are more able to enforce boundaries, reject dangerous clients, and seek justice when harmed.

Labor Rights: The Forgotten Side of the Debate

When prostitution is illegal, workers lack any labor protections. They cannot:

  • Sue employers

  • Report harassment

  • Collect unpaid wages

  • Form collectives or unions

  • Demand workplace safety

Decriminalized systems allow sex workers to pursue claims for harassment, unsafe conditions, or exploitation. This does not romanticize the work. It recognizes that rights matter even in uncomfortable industries.

Digital Platforms: SESTA/FOSTA and the Collapse of Online Safety

The rise of the internet radically changed sex work. Online platforms allowed workers to:

  • Screen clients

  • Avoid pimps

  • Work indoors

  • Reduce violence

  • Build customer lists

  • Maintain anonymity

Then Congress passed SESTA/FOSTA in 2018, holding platforms liable for “facilitating prostitution.” Websites shut down escort ads. Backpage was seized. Craigslist purged personals. Payment processors panicked. Sex workers lost digital safety nets overnight.

The results were swift:

  • Increased violence

  • Increased homelessness

  • Increased reliance on coercive intermediaries

  • Less visibility for identifying trafficking victims

The law was sold as anti-trafficking legislation. But many trafficking experts argued it did the opposite by dismantling tools that actually helped identify victims and protect adults.

PART IV: THE FEMINIST CIVIL WAR

Few topics divide feminism more than prostitution. The conflict is not just political—it is philosophical, emotional, and deeply personal. Below are the major schools of thought.

Radical / Abolitionist Feminism: Prostitution as Patriarchal Violence

Radical feminists argue that prostitution is inherently exploitative. They believe:

  • No one “chooses” prostitution freely

  • Consent under economic pressure is not meaningful

  • Men’s ability to buy sexual access reinforces male dominance

  • Legalization or decriminalization normalizes inequality

For radical feminists, the Nordic model is the ideal approach. They frame prostitution as “paid rape,” “sexual exploitation,” or “patriarchal power masquerading as choice.”

Their central moral claim:
A society that permits men to buy women cannot achieve equality.

Liberal Feminism: Autonomy, Choice, and Legal Equality

Liberal feminists take a different approach. They argue:

  • Women have the right to make decisions about their bodies

  • Criminalization harms sex workers more than prostitution itself

  • Adults should be free to engage in consensual transactions

  • The state should not enforce moral purity through policing

For them, prostitution is not inherently empowering or degrading—it is a form of labor shaped by conditions. They prioritize bodily autonomy and equal protection under the law.

Sex-Positive Feminism: Consent, Pleasure, and Agency

Sex-positive feminists emphasize:

  • The importance of respecting sexual autonomy

  • The existence of empowered sex workers

  • The danger of conflating all sex work with abuse

  • The agency of people who choose the industry for flexible work or personal reasons

They view stigmatization as a major harm and argue that shame-based policies worsen outcomes.

Intersectional Feminism: Policing, Race, and Migration

Intersectional feminists highlight how prostitution laws disproportionately punish:

  • Black women

  • Trans women

  • Migrant women

  • Indigenous women

  • Undocumented workers

They focus on the lived realities of systemic inequality. They argue that anti-prostitution policies often become tools for racial profiling, deportation, and police violence.

Their stance:
If your feminist model relies on more policing, it is not liberation.

Anti-Carceral Feminism: Beyond Criminal Punishment

This branch rejects carceral approaches to gender inequality. Anti-carceral feminists argue:

  • Criminalization expands prisons and police power

  • Rescue missions become raids

  • Criminal law cannot fix poverty or trauma

  • Survivors often need services, not arrests

  • Abolitionist approaches can replicate patriarchal control

They advocate decriminalization, economic support, and community-based responses.

Marxist Feminism: Commodification and Class Power

Marxist feminists see prostitution as a product of capitalist inequality. They emphasize:

  • Economic coercion

  • Class exploitation

  • The commodification of women’s bodies

Some Marxist feminists support abolition; others support decriminalization:

Abolitionist Marxists argue prostitution is incompatible with equality and must be eliminated through structural change.
Decriminalizing Marxists argue eliminating prostitution without eliminating poverty simply punishes the poorest women.

Marxism adds an important lens: prostitution sits at the intersection of patriarchy and capitalism—neither can explain it alone.

PART V: WHERE THE GLOBAL AND U.S. DEBATES COLLIDE

The Global North vs Global South Divide

In wealthier countries, arguments often center around ideology—feminism, autonomy, or moral decline. In poorer countries, the debate is more concrete:

  • Lack of jobs

  • Migration patterns

  • Gender-based violence

  • Civil conflict

  • Weak social safety nets

Anti-trafficking policies crafted in the West often disregard the realities of migrant labor across Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

American Contradictions

The United States is uniquely contradictory:

  • Prostitution is criminalized almost everywhere

  • Pornography is a protected industry

  • Strip clubs thrive

  • OnlyFans is mainstream

  • Sexually explicit content is monetized by corporations

  • “Indecency” laws are inconsistently applied

The message is chaotic: if you perform sex in person, you’re a criminal; if you livestream it, you’re a creator; if you’re exploited by a studio, you’re an employee; if you’re exploited by a boyfriend, you’re a victim.

The Political Weaponization of Prostitution

Prostitution becomes a tool for:

  • Moral conservatives to push religious values

  • Progressive politicians to promote feminist purity

  • Police departments to justify budgets

  • Tech platforms to sanitize their brands

  • Lawmakers to “look tough on trafficking” without tackling root causes

Rarely do these groups consult sex workers themselves.

PART VI: WHAT THIS ALL MEANS

The politics of prostitution reveal a simple truth: laws around sex work are not about sex. They are about control. They determine who the state protects, who it punishes, and who it ignores.

Questions We Must Confront

Are we comfortable with policies that increase violence against sex workers in the name of symbolic morality?
Are we willing to accept that some adults freely choose sex work, even in systems stacked against them?
Are we prepared to listen when sex workers say what they need, even when their needs conflict with ideological agendas?
Are we willing to separate voluntary sex work from trafficking—a distinction many policymakers resist?

No Perfect System Exists

Every model has trade-offs:

  • Criminalization punishes the vulnerable

  • Legalization creates tiers and exclusions

  • Decriminalization normalizes an uncomfortable market

  • Nordic models hide the trade rather than eliminate it

The debate is not about finding the perfect model. It is about choosing which harms we are willing to tolerate—and which harms we actively create.

CONCLUSION: POWER, EVIDENCE, AND HUMAN DIGNITY

If prostitution tells us anything, it is that societies are deeply conflicted about sexuality, autonomy, and inequality. The modern political battles—whether in Washington, Brussels, Stockholm, Sydney, or New York—are not simply moral debates. They are struggles over who gets to define womanhood, consent, deviance, and dignity.

A serious policy requires three commitments:

Power: Examine who shapes prostitution laws and whom they benefit.
Evidence: Evaluate what actually reduces harm—not what fits a moral worldview.
Voice: Listen to the people whose bodies are most affected, even when their truths challenge our politics.

The politics of prostitution are messy because the world that produces prostitution is messy. Poverty, trauma, inequality, patriarchy, capitalism, migration, policing, and technology all collide in this one issue. No law can erase that complexity. But better laws can stop making it worse.

The future of prostitution policy will not be shaped by purity crusades or utopian fantasies. It will be shaped by whether we face the world as it is, listen to the people who live in its shadows, and dare to build systems that treat them as human beings—not symbols.

References

Discover more from Timothy Alexander

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply